| | World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 | |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Symitri

Posts: 673 Join date: 2009-01-02 Age: 22
 | |
 | |
shironeko

Posts: 307 Join date: 2008-04-15
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:24 am | |
| Libram of obstruction, double in duration? HOLY CRAP. Then the libram that ups the spell power for conc is like uhh... Wait wait, don't tell me, AoE tanking right? /facewall. _________________ "Keep in mind that it's important to set goals so you feel appropriately pathetic when you fail to achieve them." - The Onion. zomgnekomewmewmew!
|
|
 | |
Valdr Officer

Posts: 954 Join date: 2008-03-14
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:19 pm | |
| PTR character copy is available now. I just copied Valdr over. It was instant. _________________  |
|
 | |
Gallowyn Officer

Posts: 927 Join date: 2008-04-13
 | |
 | |
Symitri

Posts: 673 Join date: 2009-01-02 Age: 22
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:39 am | |
| Reading over it: T9 warrior 4 set bonus is OP. There's no other way of saying it. Its hilarious because warriors are probably -just- completing their t8 sets atm because of an OP set bonus, so they're looking at replacing four pieces over again. Let's hope t9 is better itemised. Lack of other warrior changes *sigh*. No comment. _________________ Stand for something, Or you'll fall for anything - Skindred
|
|
 | |
Luvme Officer

Posts: 448 Join date: 2008-03-20
 | |
 | |
Naushan Officer

Posts: 1074 Join date: 2008-03-16 Location: Singapore
 | |
 | |
Rhodie
Posts: 402 Join date: 2009-01-08
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:46 am | |
| They finally added something for shadow priests! Too bad it's a nerf. /cry _________________ There is no patch for stupidity.
|
|
 | |
Darkmare
Posts: 9 Join date: 2008-06-25 Age: 24 Location: Perth W.A
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:53 am | |
| I'm so happy going through all the trouble of doing my warlock quest for a mount costing me 100 of gold and now you can have it at lvl 40 but on the plus side warlocks aren't getting nerfed unless your a des warlock which I'm not  |
|
 | |
izzia Officer

Posts: 592 Join date: 2008-03-28
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:31 am | |
| Omg they named a landing after valdr's warrior toon old name!!! Hrothgar's landing Too bad he lost that name during the transfer to nagrand. |
|
 | |
Mayonnaise

Posts: 280 Join date: 2009-02-03 Location: Between 2 slices of lettuce, tomatoes and 2 grilled beef patties
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:40 am | |
| |
|
 | |
Boobsie Officer

Posts: 756 Join date: 2008-03-17
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:37 pm | |
| Not sure what to expect on DKs. 3.2 will see a nerf in AOE damage and high end strike damage, low end damage will be buffed a little from the looks of it. T9 bonus sets are cool though for DK. This time round, its strange that they posted the bonus stats for tier set rather than their graphic first. Usually, its the graphic before set bonuses. You can bet that these set bonuses will definitely change. _________________  80 DK | 80 Lock | 80 Warrior | 80 Priest | 80 Paladin | 80 Mage | 80 Hunter | 45 Rogue | 35 Shammy | ? Druid |
|
 | |
Kaziopoeia

Posts: 235 Join date: 2008-11-05
 | |
 | |
Sederinn

Posts: 99 Join date: 2009-01-08 Location: Los Angeles
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:45 pm | |
| i think i'm about to puke in my mouth...these sets are horrible ugh i hate them...  is this even a set? _________________  |
|
 | |
Kaziopoeia

Posts: 235 Join date: 2008-11-05
 | Subject: Re: World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:53 pm | |
| hahaha love the paladin headpiece... it looks like a jewish skull cap, and the 3/4 length trousers... it's camper than graham norton. The gloves are ok... it looks like he's taken Kologarn's arms _________________  |
|
 | |
| | World of Warcraft PTR Patch 3.2 | |
|